The Next Bottleneck Isn’t the Model, It’s the Hardware

By The Non-Von Team

There’s rarely a conversation where AI isn’t mentioned. It’s advancing fast.That’s no surprise. What gets missed in most conversations is the infrastructure and the fact that we’re still trying to run these next-gen models on last-gen infrastructure.

The result is a growing mismatch between what AI is capable of and what current hardware can actually support. This gap is becoming one of the biggest barriers to progress. And it’s time the conversation shifts to focus on proactive solutions, like new chip technology, vs. AI performance.

Why AI Progress Is Running Into a Wall

Over the last few years, AI models have changed in ways that aren’t just noticeable, they’re foundational. They’ve grown in size, taken on more sparsity, become more dynamic, and now run across a wider range of environments from massive cloud clusters to edge devices with strict power limits.

These aren’t surface-level updates or new product releases.  They reshape what compute infrastructure needs to support.

Today’s models don’t behave like the dense, uniform workloads existing hardware was built for. They include conditional logic, multimodal inputs, and irregular memory access patterns. They shift and adapt during inference. And yet, most of them are still running on systems optimized for raw throughput not for the complexity they actually bring.

The Hardware Fit Is All Wrong.

General-purpose GPUs are being relied upon to run advanced AI models. That’s a problem because these chips were built for graphics, not intelligence. They follow the classic Von Neumann architecture, (where memory and compute are physically separate) which means data has to move constantly just to get basic work done.

That back-and-forth burns energy, adds latency, and turns into a real bottleneck as models grow more complex. And because GPUs don’t natively support unstructured sparsity, they tend to ignore it, leaving efficiency gains on the table.

The degradation in performance is one of the issues AI operations today faces. More concerning is the fundamental mismatch between how today’s AI models behave and the capabilities of the hardware they run on was built to do.

How Infrastructure Gaps Show Up in the Real World

​These architectural mismatches show up quickly in the real world. Inference latency climbs even on high-end hardware. Power then becomes a constraint, especially in edge environments, mobile devices, or anywhere thermal budgets are tight.

Models are pruned to be lighter, but current hardware forces them back into bulky formats canceling those gains. And as developers, engineers, and researchers continue to innovate, they’re still limited by the reality of existing hardware unless AI chips built for this workload are readily available.

Why Non-Von Took a Different Approach
At Non-Von, we’ve been thinking about the need for improved hardware. Constanty. We’ve seen the shift in AI models and knew that existing hardware was not suitable for the AI revolution. Instead of squeezing more out of an outdated architecture, we started over, and designed a chip for how modern models actually compute.

Our chips are sparse-native, meaning they process unstructured sparsity directly. Pruned models don’t need to be reshaped or re-densified. They just run faster and more efficiently. They do what is required to support the AI boom. 

Non -Von chips also keep compute close to memory. That reduces the overhead of constant data movement and helps eliminate the Von Neumann bottleneck entirely. 

And we made it easy to use. Our software stack works with PyTorch, ONNX, and TensorFlow. With just a few lines of code, teams can plug into Non-Von’s acceleration without restructuring their models. We’re working on the solution for future AI operations. 

Where Progress Stalls

​It’s not just about speed or power efficiency. It’s about whether the next generation of AI breakthroughs will be possible at all or whether they’ll get stuck waiting on infrastructure that wasn’t built to support them.

If we want to keep pushing what’s possible, we can’t keep asking outdated systems to carry the load. We need to rethink what AI hardware should look like and align it with the models we’re actually building.

​